Cases 11 - 20 of 76,859
NDOROMO v. GARLAND
as 1:2024cv01359
Plaintiff:
AKUBE WUROMONI NDOROMO
Defendant:
MERRICK B. GARLAND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01350
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01358
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01354
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01357
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01360
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
AMERICANS FOR PROSPERITY FOUNDATION v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2024cv01349
Plaintiff:
AMERICANS FOR PROSPERITY FOUNDATION
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
JUDICIAL WATCH, INC. v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024cv01352
Plaintiff:
JUDICIAL WATCH, INC.
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
WP COMPANY LLC v. NATIONAL HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SAFETY ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2024cv01353
Plaintiff:
WP COMPANY LLC
Defendant:
NATIONAL HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SAFETY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
USA v. Jose Valasquez
as 24-3054
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jose Eduardo Valasquez, also known as Jose Valazquez, also known as Jose Eduardo Valasquez
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
