Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Philo et al v. Google LLC
as 1:2019cv00393
Plaintiff:
Scott Philo and Massagechairsforless.com LLC
Defendant:
Google LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scott v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 1:2017cv00358
Plaintiff:
Linda-Lee Scott
Defendant:
Camping World RV Sales, Ford Motor Company, Gary's RV Centers, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Unity School District v. Vaughn Associates, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00155
Third Party Defendant:
Excel Mechanical, Inc., School Administrative Unit #6, Superior Walls of the Hudson Valley, Inc. and others
Counter Defendant:
Unity School District
Plaintiff:
Unity School District
Defendant:
Scott Vaughn and Vaughn Associates, Inc.
Third Party Plaintiff:
Vaughn Associates, Inc.
Counter Claimant:
Vaughn Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Contract Dispute
Barry et al v. Meat House Franchising, LLC et al
as 1:2014cv00033
Plaintiff:
Edward R. Barry, William Kenney, Scott J. Nathan and others
Defendant:
Centrix Bank & Trust, Trustee, J&J Investments, LLC and Meat House Franchising, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Montgomery et al v. Montgomery
as 1:2010cv00536
Plaintiff:
Nadezda Montgomery and Ivan Vergizov
Defendant:
Scott Montgomery
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 118
NGM Insurance Company v. Pendleton et al
as 1:2010cv00237
Defendant:
Scott King and Harvey Pendleton
Plaintiff:
NGM Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Kent et al v. Sellers, et al
as 1:2010cv00131
Defendant:
Scott Baker and David Sellers
Plaintiff:
Evelyn Kent and George Kent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Scott's of Keene, Inc. v. Piaggio USA, Inc.
as 1:2009cv00122
Plaintiff:
Scott's of Keene, Inc.
Defendant:
Piaggio USA, Inc., Piaggio USA, Inc., Piaggio USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
