Cases 91 - 100 of 216
WYMAN v. YATES AMERICAN MACHINE COMPANY et al
as 1:2013cv00300
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE WYMAN
Defendant:
YATES-AMERICAN MACHINE COMPANY and DK SPEC INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
MCILVAINE et al v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY
as 2:2012cv00111
Plaintiff:
TETYANA MCILVAINE and MICHAEL MCILVAINE
Defendant:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
SNOKE et al v. ESCALADE SPORTS INC et al
as 1:2013cv00093
Plaintiff:
DONALD D SNOKE and JANICE SNOKE
Defendant:
ESCALADE SPORTS INC and WAL-MART STORES EAST LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MESSIER v. WALKER MANUFACTURING COMPANY
as 2:2013cv00040
Plaintiff:
NATHAN MESSIER
Defendant:
WALKER MANUFACTURING COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
VEILLEUX et al v. GENIE INDUSTRIES
as 1:2013cv00029
Plaintiff:
DONALD J VEILLEUX and MARGARET E VEILLEUX
Defendant:
GENIE INDUSTRIES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
NADEAU v. ZIMMER INC
as 1:2012cv00397
Plaintiff:
EDWARD NADEAU
Defendant:
ZIMMER INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
GROLLEY et al v. ZIMMER INC et al
as 2:2012cv00383
Plaintiff:
JANET GROLLEY and JOHN GROLLEY
Defendant:
ZIMMER INC, ZIMMER HOLDINGS INC and ZIMMER ORTHOPAEDIC SURGICAL PRODUCTS INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
BONNEAU v. R F HUNTER CO INC
as 2:2012cv00351
Plaintiff:
DEREK BONNEAU
Defendant:
R F HUNTER CO INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
BRIDGES v. DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS INC
as 1:2012cv00325
Plaintiff:
TODD A BRIDGES
Defendant:
DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SINGLETON v. LEKTRO INC
as 1:2012cv00256
Plaintiff:
HINSON B SINGLETON
Defendant:
LEKTRO INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
