Other Statutory Actions Cases filed in New Hampshire
Cases 141 - 150 of 362
Zyliak v. Absolute Credit, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv00089
Defendant: Absolute Credit, LLC and Ear, Nose & Throat Physicians & Surgeons, P.A.
Plaintiff: George Zyliak
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
USA v. Eisenberg
as 1:2015cv00077
Defendant: Charles D. Eisenberg
Plaintiff: USA
Cause Of Action: Registration of Foreign Judgment
USA v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2015cv00041
Defendant: Atrium Medical Corporation, Gail Christie, Heinz Jacqui and others
Plaintiff: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Demers et al v. Everest Receivable Services, Inc.
as 1:2015cv00018
Plaintiff: Kenneth Demers and Nicole Demers
Defendant: Everest Receivable Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Bersaw v. Matthew Thomas & Associates
as 1:2015cv00002
Plaintiff: Douglas Bersaw
Defendant: Matthew Thomas & Associates
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Skiff v. J.A. Cambece Law Office, PC
as 1:2014cv00571
Defendant: J.A. Cambece Law Office, PC
Plaintiff: John Skiff
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
USA v. Hanson
as 1:2014cv00532
Defendant: James B. Hanson
Plaintiff: USA
Cause Of Action: Contempt Proceedings
Gazda v. Midland Credit Management, Inc.
as 1:2014cv00379
Plaintiff: Gertrude M. Gazda
Defendant: Midland Credit Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Washer v. Delta Management Associates, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00290
Defendant: Delta Management Associates, Inc. and Cheryl Warner
Plaintiff: Frederic Washer
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Marsh v. Focus Receivables Management, LLC
as 1:2014cv00281
Defendant: Focus Receivables Management, LLC
Plaintiff: Michael Marsh
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?