Cases 71 - 80 of 1,414
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00233
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
VAN ECK et al v. AMERICAN SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2022cv00207
Plaintiff:
LINDA VAN ECK and JAN VAN ECK
Defendant:
AMERICAN SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY and CITIZENS BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00246
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
STATE OF MAINE v. LIBERTY BELL MOVING & STORAGE INC et al
as 2:2022cv00204
Plaintiff:
STATE OF MAINE
Defendant:
LIBERTY BELL MOVING & STORAGE INC and KEVIN V FINKENAUR
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. GIAMBRO
as 2:2022cv00220
Respondent:
DARIO GIAMBRO
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
EGLAUS v. CARD
as 1:2022cv00219
Plaintiff:
OLINDA EGLAUS
Defendant:
JAMES B CARD, II
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1801 Farmworker Rights
CWRI HOLDINGS LLC v. MALLAR et al
as 2:2022cv00152
Plaintiff:
CWRI HOLDINGS LLC
Defendant:
STEVE MALLAR, LLEWELLYN "BUCK" RANDALL, MAINE PRINTER SUPPLY COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121 Trademark Infringement
ELGASIM MOHAMED FADLALLA, ET AL v. WESTERN MAIN ACCOUNTING SERVICES LLC
as 2:2022mc00081
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
CAREY v. ETRADE INC
as 2:2022cv00177
Plaintiff:
SETH T CAREY
Defendant:
ETRADE INC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
LUNT DRESSER et al v. NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS DEVELOPERS et al
as 2:2022cv00121
Plaintiff:
JAY P LUNT DRESSER, SIERRA CLUB OF PORTLAND MAINE, SIERRA CLUB OF MAINE and others
Defendant:
DEVELOPERS OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
