Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Henry v. Sonesta San Juan LLC et al
as 3:2023cv01218
Plaintiff:
Rashid T Henry
Defendant:
Sonesta San Juan LLC, Sonesta International Hotels Corporation, Sompo America Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Fenske et al v. CVS Pharmacy (of Puerto Rico), Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01292
Plaintiff:
Henry Fenske and Lucia Cruz Fenske
Defendant:
CVS Pharmacy (of Puerto Rico), Inc. and Municipio de Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Henry-Ravelo et al v. Hospital Auxilio Mutuo
as 3:2019cv01012
Plaintiff:
Franklin Henry-Ravelo, Franklin J. Henry-Ortiz, Elisa E. Henry-Ravelo and others
Defendant:
Hospital Auxilio Mutuo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402
DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS MEMBER CASE-LEAD CASE IS NOW CIVIL NO. 16-2529(DRD)
as 3:2017cv01008
Plaintiff:
DAVID ARIALDIS ARIAS SORIANO , ROBINSON GONZLEZ POLANCO , HENRY A. NAVARRO JOHNSON and others
Defendant:
America Cruise Ferries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
Hodgson-Gomez et al v. MetroHealth, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv01705
Plaintiff:
Marcos A. Hodgson-Gomez , Henry J. Hodgson-Mico , Iris Rosa and others
Defendant:
MetroHealth, Inc., Continental Insurance Company, Jorge Rivera-Vargas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mercado-Vega et al v. Fressenius Medical Care et al
as 3:2008cv01419
Plaintiff:
Wilfredo Mercado-Vega, Wilfredo Mercado-Vega, Henry Mercado-Vega and others
Defendant:
Fressenius Medical Care, BioMedical Application of Puerto Rico, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Bailey et al v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 3:2007cv02161
Plaintiff:
Don Bailey, Joseph Crawnley, Jr., Edward Dickhausen and others
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic Puerto Rico, Inc. and Medtronic Puerto Rico Operations Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
