Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Rivera-Rodriguez et al v. Hospital Pavia Hato Rey, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv01416
Plaintiff:
Jazmin Rivera-Rodriguez , Sammuel Ramadan-Khoony and Ramadan-Rivera Conjugal Partnership
Defendant:
Hospital Pavia Hato Rey, Inc. , Hospital Espanol Auxilio Mutuo de PR, Inc., Julio Santiago-Cartagena and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Diaz-Martinez v. Hospital Pavia Hato Rey, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv01732
Plaintiff:
Nikole Diaz-Martinez
Defendant:
Hospital Pavia Hato Rey, Inc., Juan Maldonado-Ravelo, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
XL Specialty Insurance Company v. Carmona Gonzalez et al
as 3:2010cv01795
Plaintiff:
XL Specialty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Waldemar Carmona Gonzalez, Nigua Agro Industrial Corp., Constructora Hato Rey, S.E. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sosa-Febo, et als v. Metro Hato Rey, Inc.,et als
as 3:2010cv01154
Plaintiff:
Luz Virginia Sosa-Febo and Fernando Arturo Sosa-Febo
Defendant:
Metro Hato Rey, Inc., Columbia Casualty Company, Continental Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Sosa et al v. Pavia Hospital Hato Rey, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv01468
Plaintiff:
Sara Sosa, Sara Sosa, Carmen Luz Sosa and others
Defendant:
Pavia Hospital Hato Rey, Inc., Columbia Casualty Company Inc., Hospital San Francisco, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv02328
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Benitez-Rodriguez, et al v. Hospital Pavia Hato Rey, Inc.
as 3:2008cv01630
Plaintiff:
Maria Elsa Benitez-Rodriguez, Maria Esther Listte-Acosta, Hector Codazzi-Benitez and others
Defendant:
Hospital Pavia Hato Rey, Inc., Metro Pavia Health System, Inc., Sistema de Salud Metropolitano, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
