Cases 61 - 70 of 96
HENDRIX v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 2:2015cv00141
Plaintiff:
LEATRICE HENDRIX
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON and ETHICON INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
VADAS v. DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS INC et al
as 2:2015cv00074
Plaintiff:
JAMES VADAS
Defendant:
DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS INC, DEPUY PRODUCTS INC, DEPUY INTERNATIONAL LIMITED and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MORRIS et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 2:2014cv00273
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA MORRIS and RON BAILYN
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, ETHICON INC and ETHICON LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CARTER v. BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION et al
as 2:2014cv00258
Plaintiff:
DAYLE CARTER
Defendant:
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION, JOHNSON & JOHNSON, ETHICON INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 2:2014cv00245
Plaintiff:
CHERIKA JONES
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, ETHICON INC and ETHICON LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CULLETON v. DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS INC et al
as 2:2014cv00176
Plaintiff:
JASON CULLETON
Defendant:
DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS INC, DEPUY INC, DEPUY INTERNATIONAL LIMITED and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
EVANS et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 2:2014cv00138
Plaintiff:
CHERYL EVANS and ROBERT EVANS
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, ETHICON INC and ETHICON LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WHITE et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 2:2014cv00103
Plaintiff:
ROXANNE WHITE and JAMES WHITE
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, ETHICON INC and ETHICON LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FINALE v. DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS INC et al
as 1:2013cv00401
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA FINALE
Defendant:
DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS INC, DEPUY PRODUCTS INC, DEPUY INTERNATIONAL LIMITED and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOWARD v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 2:2013cv00393
Plaintiff:
BARBARA HOWARD
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, ETHICON INC and ETHICON LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
