Cases 41 - 50 of 117
United States v. Carter, et al
as 14-2180
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
KENT CARTER and KENT CARTER, as Trustee for the Kent Carter Family Trust PTO
Defendant:
GAIL CARTER and NEW MEXICO DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE AND TAXATION
United States v. Austin
as 14-2148
Petitioner - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Respondent - Appellant:
MARK E. AUSTIN
Rott v. Oklahoma Tax Commission, et al
as 14-6152
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN E. ROTT
Defendant - Appellee:
OKLAHOMA TAX COMMISSION, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, JAY HARRINGTON and others
United States v. Melot, et al
as 14-2120
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
BILLY R. MELOT and KATHERINE L. MELOT
Defendant:
KLM TRUST, LEIGH CORPORATION, SUZANNE CORPORATION and others
United States v. Barrett, et al
as 14-1179
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CHARLES BARRETT and KATHLEEN BARRETT
McKinzy v. IRS
as 14-3068
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL E. MCKINZY, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
United States v. Melot (Billy), et al
as 14-2044
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
BILLY R. MELOT
Defendant:
KATHERINE L. MELOT, KLM TRUST, LEIGH CORPORATION and others
United States v. Melot (Katherine), et al
as 14-2045
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
KATHERINE L. MELOT
Defendant:
BILLY R. MELOT, KLM TRUST, LEIGH CORPORATION and others
United States v. Troyer
as 14-8021
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DARWIN L. TROYER
Acheff v. United States, et al
as 14-2033
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant:
WILLIAM B. ACHEFF
Defendant-Counter-Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant Cross Claim Defendant - Appellant:
PETER B. LAZARE
Third-Party-Defendant - Appellant:
JON J. EDELMAN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
