Cases 101 - 110 of 1,583
Unitednet, et al v. Tata Communications America, et al
as 23-2057
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITEDNET LTD. and LEVI RUSSELL
Defendant / Appellee:
TATA COMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, INC., TATA COMMUNICATIONS INDIA, TATA SONS PRIVATE, LTD. and others
Chesapeake Operating v. C.C. Forbes
as 23-6052
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CHESAPEAKE OPERATING, LLC
Defendant / Appellant:
C.C. FORBES, LLC
Brody v. Bruner
as 23-1102
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID E. BRODY
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK E. BRUNER, as trustee of the Bruner Family Trust and THE BRUNER FAMILY TRUST
Tungsten Parts Wyoming v. Omanoff, et al
as 23-8018
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TUNGSTEN PARTS WYOMING, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
DENNIS OMANOFF, GEORGE PAZOS, GLOBAL TUNGSTEN AND POWDERS CORP. and others
Lenexa 95 Partners v. Kin, Inc.
as 23-3043
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LENEXA 95 PARTNERS, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
KIN, INC., FKA Kohl's, Inc.
White & Weddle v. Shatar Holdings, et al
as 23-6032
Plaintiff / Appellant:
1005, LLC, AMF DEVELOPMENT, LLC, AMIR FARZANEH and others
Defendant / Appellee:
SHATAR HOLDINGS, LLC, SHATAR CAPITAL, INC., EZRI NAMVAR and others
Auer v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 23-1062
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SUSAN AUER
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
Huff v. BP Corporation North America, et al
as 23-5022
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROLAND HUFF
Defendant / Appellee:
BP CORPORATION NORTH AMERICA, INC. and METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Wohlford v. American Auto Shield, et al
as 23-6025
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN WOHLFORD
Defendant / Appellee:
AMERICAN AUTO SHIELD LLC, NRRM LLC, DBA Carshield LLC, AMERICAN BANKERS INSURANCE COMPANY FLORIDA and others
Jaquez v. PAACAR, et al
as 23-2023
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TRINIDAD JAQUEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
PAACAR, INC., d/b/a Peterbilt Motor Company and UNITED EQUIPMENT FUNDING, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
