Cases 111 - 120 of 1,582
Lenexa 95 Partners v. Kin
as 23-3025
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LENEXA 95 PARTNERS, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
KIN, INC., FKA Kohl's, Inc.
Hollaar, et al v. Marketpro South
as 23-4018
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEE A. HOLLAAR and AUDREY M. HOLLAAR
Defendant / Appellee:
MARKETPRO SOUTH INC., a Maryland corporation and MARKETPRO SOUTH, INC., a Maryland corporation
Sherman v. Liberty Mutual, et al
as 23-1034
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CANDACE ELAINE SHERMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY and LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY
Mabrey Bancorporation, et al v. Everest National
as 23-5006
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MABREY BANCORPORATION, INC. and MABREY BANK
Defendant / Appellee:
EVEREST NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Dyno Nobel v. Steadfast Insurance Company
as 23-4010
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DYNO NOBEL, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
STEADFAST INSURANCE COMPANY
SGS Acquisition Company Limited v. Linsley, et al
as 23-1016
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SGS ACQUISITION COMPANY LIMITED
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID LINSLEY, BERNARD GUARNERA and BROADLANDS MINERAL ADVISORY SERVICES, LTD.
XMission, LC v. PureHealth Research
as 23-4001
Plaintiff / Appellant:
XMISSION, L.C., a Utah company
Defendant / Appellee:
PUREHEALTH RESEARCH, a Virginia business entity
Healy v. Citizens State Bank, et al
as 22-6216
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MARK C. HEALY, as assignee for PSM Holdings Inc., Prime Source Mortgage Inc., and WWYH
Defendant:
CITIZENS STATE BANK
3Rd Party Defendant:
JEFFREY SMITH
Johnson v. USANA Health Sciences
as 22-4126
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LYNN ALLEN JOHNSON, an individual
Defendant / Appellee:
USANA HEALTH SCIENCES, INC., a Utah corporation
ORP Surgical, et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
as 22-1455
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ORP SURGICAL, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company and LEE PETRIDES
Defendant / Appellee:
HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORP., a New Jersey corporation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
