Cases 21 - 24 of 24
Lincoln General Insurance Comp v. Smith, et al
as 10-3082
Plaintiff - Appellee:
LINCOLN GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant - Appellant:
ERIC S. SMITH and HEATHER BAKER
Britton v. Parker, et al
as 09-1473
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEON BRITTON, Derivatively On Behalf of Delta Petroleum corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
ROGER A. PARKER, ALERON H. LARSON, JR., KEVIN K. NANKE and others
Defendant:
DELTA PETROLEUM CORPORATION,, a Delaware corporation
Jage, et al v. Trust Company of Oklahoma, et al
as 09-5029
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARY ROMA JAGE, individually and as mother and next friend of Vilia T. Jage and MICHAEL P. JAGE
Defendant - Appellee:
TRUST COMPANY OF OKLAHOMA, RONALD J. SAFFA, individually and as a shareholder in Morrel, West, Saffa, Craige & Hicks, Inc. and J.P. MORGAN CHASE
Defendant:
JAMES CRAIG MILTON, individually and as a partner in Doerner, Saunders, Daniel & Anderson, L.L.P., WILLIAM C. KELLOUGH, individually and as partner and shareholder in Boone, Smith, Davis, Hurst & Dickman, BOONE, SMITH, DAVIS, HURST & DICKMAN and others
Defendant-Intervenor - Appellee:
YORKTOWN HOLDING, LLC., an Oklahoma limited liability company
Jage, et al v. Trust Company of Oklahoma, et al
as 09-5003
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARY ROMA JAGE, individually and as mother and next friend of Vilia T. Jage and MICHAEL P. JAGE
Defendant - Appellee:
TRUST COMPANY OF OKLAHOMA, RONALD J. SAFFA, individually and as a shareholder in Morrel, West, Saffa, Craige & Hicks, Inc. and J.P. MORGAN CHASE
Defendant:
JAMES CRAIG MILTON, individually and as a partner in Doerner, Saunders, Daniel & Anderson, L.L.P., PATRICIA WALLACE HASTINGS, THOMAS W. WILKINS, individually and as President, Chief Executive Officer, and Chairman of the Board of Trust Company of Oklahoma and others
Defendant-Intervenor - Appellee:
YORKTOWN HOLDING, LLC., an Oklahoma limited liability company
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
