Cases 1 - 4 of 4
Joint Technology v. Weaver, et al
as 13-6157
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOINT TECHNOLOGY, INC., DBA Revert Systems
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY KENT WEAVER, JR. and WEAVER MEDICAL GROUP, INC.
Joint Technology v. Weaver, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 13-6070
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellant:
JOINT TECHNOLOGY, INC., an Oklahoma corporation
Defendant-Third-Party-Plaintiff - Appellee:
GARY KENT WEAVER, JR.
Third-Party-Defendant - Appellant:
JIM PATTON
Intervenor:
WEAVER MEDICAL GROUP, INC.
Stewart Title Guaranty Company v. Dude, et al
as 11-1393
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY, a Texas corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
HARALD DUDE, individually and as general partner of Dee Investments Limited Partnership, a Nevada limited partnership
Defendant:
DENISE ROBERTS, individually and as general partner of Dee Investments Limited Partnership, a Nevada limited partnership
Third-Party-Defendant - Appellee:
DEE INVESTMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Nevada limited partnership
Third-Party-Defendant:
WEAVER & MITCHELL, INC., STEWART TITLE OF COLORADO INC. and DAVID LESTER
Stewart Title v. Dude, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 11-1374
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY, a Texas corporation
Defendant - Appellant:
HARALD DUDE, individually and as general partner of Dee Investments Limited Partnership, a Nevada limited partnership
Defendant:
DENISE ROBERTS, individually and as general partner of Dee Investments Limited Partnership, a Nevada limited partnership
Third-Party-Defendant - Appellant:
DEE INVESTMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Nevada limited partnership
Third-Party-Defendant:
WEAVER & MITCHELL, INC., STEWART TITLE OF COLORADO INC. and DAVID LESTER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.