Cases 31 - 40 of 59
In re: Smith
as 16-6112
Petitioner:
In re: FRANKLIN C. SMITH
Respondent:
RAE HOWELL, Nurse, LLOYD MOORE, Doctor, MICHAEL CASTEEL, Officer and others
In re: Smith
as 16-5012
Petitioner:
In re: FRANKLIN C. SMITH
Respondent:
STANLEY GLANZ and TRACY JENNINGS
In re: Smith, et al
as 15-5078
Petitioner:
In re: FRANKLIN C. SMITH
Respondent:
DUSTIN DUBOISE and ERNEST MENDENHALL
United States v. Goodwin
as 15-3054
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
FRANKLIN GOODWIN, JR.
Goodwin v. Heller Ehrman, et al
as 14-1500
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JON A. GOODWIN, an individual, directly and derivatively in the right of and for the benefit of Barra Partners, LLC, a Delaware limint liability company
Defendant - Appellee:
MARCIA ANN BRUGGEMAN-HATCH, an individual, SEAMUS JOHN PAUL HATCH, an individual, MICHAEL DOUGLAS BOCK, an individual and others
Buck v. Kentucky Horse Racing, et al
as 14-4113
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD ALLAN BUCK
Defendant - Appellee:
KENTUCKY HORSE RACING COMMISSION, ROBERT M. BECK, JR., EDWARD S. BONNIE and others
Tibbs, et al v. Koerber, et al
as 14-4098
Plaintiff - Appellee:
TOM TIBBS, PEGGY TIBBS and HOME ADVANTAGE
Defendant - Appellant:
RICK KOERBER, FRANKLINSQUIRES COMPANY, LLC, a Utah Limited Liability Company, FOUNDERS CAPITAL INVESTMENTS, a Utah Limited Liability Company and others
Defendant:
JASON K. VAUGHN, MELANIE F. VAUGHN, FREESTYLE HOLDINGS, a Utah Limited Liability Company and others
United States v. Franklin
as 13-1519
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RICHARD FRANKLIN, AKA westfaliaimplant
Johnson & Johnson, et al v. McCaughtry, et al
as 13-608
Petitioner:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON and ETHICON, INC.
Respondent:
TAMMY MCCAUGHTRY, LINDA PANNONE, TERESA MITCHELL and others
United States v. Franklin
as 13-3244
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
WARREN E. FRANKLIN, JR.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
