Cases 21 - 26 of 26
Peper v. Department of Agriculture, et al
as 11-1237
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH E. PEPER
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, FOREST SERVICE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, TOM TIDWELL, as Chief, in his official capacity and others
Peper v. Department of Agriculture, Uni, et al
as 08-1131
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH E. PEPER
Defendant - Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, UNITED STATES, MIKE JOHANNS, Secretary, in his official capacity, FOREST SERVICE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
United States v. Dunn, et al
as 07-4197
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee:
BRUCE LEE DUNN, HELEN C. DUNN, OAKLAND HOMES OF UTAH, a Montana Corporation and others
Elephant Butte, et al v. DOI, et al
as 06-2282
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ELEPHANT BUTTE IRRIGATION DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO and EL PASO COUNTY WATER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 1
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary of the Interior, WILLIAM E. RINNE, Acting Commissioner of Reclamation and others
State of Utah, et al v. United States, et al
as 06-4062
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STATE OF UTAH
Plaintiff-Intervenor - Appellee:
NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY, GREAT SALT LAKE AUDUBON, UTAH COUNCIL OF TROUT UNLIMITED and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, BLM, BLM, THE UNITED STATES BUREAU OF RECLAMATION and others
Defendant - Appellant:
CLINGER FAMILY PARTNERSHIP
DCR Fund I LLC v. Tal Techologies Inc., et al
as 05-6232
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DCR FUND I LLC, a Florida limited liability company
Defendant - Appellant:
TS FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, an Oklahoma limited partnership, TAL TECHOLOGIES INC. and MOSHE TAL
Defendant:
JIM ROTH, STAN INMAN, JACK CORNETT and others
Third-Party-Defendant - Appellee:
BANK ONE, N.A., T. VAN ROBERTS, C. E. RENFRO and others
Cross-Claimant - Appellee:
SUCCESSOR METRO BANK N.A., successor Metro Bank N.A.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
