Cases 31 - 40 of 95
Griffeth, et al v. United States
as 15-4112
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LINDA GRIFFETH and DARIN GRIFFETH
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Clark v. United State
as 15-2113
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PETER CLARK
Defendant - Appellee:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
O'Catherine, et al v. United State
as 15-2114
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AILEEN O'CATHERINE and STEVEN SILVER, individually and as parents and next friends of Noah Silver, a minor
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Lopez v. United State
as 15-1169
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEONARD E. LOPEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Mark v. Northern Navajo Medical, et al
as 15-2067
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARLENE MARK
Defendant - Appellee:
NORTHERN NAVAJO MEDICAL CENTER, CYNTHIA LEE OLSON and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Estate of Vera Cummings v. United State
as 15-2044
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ESTATE OF VERA CUMMINGS, by and through Personal Representative Elicia Montoya
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Garcia, et al v. United States, et al
as 14-2226
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VERONICA GARCIA, on behalf of the minor children, PCG, PCG, VCG, and SCG and THE ESTATE OF JORGE ALBERTO CARRERA ALVAREZ
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. and STEVEN C. YARBROUGH, Acting U.S. Attorney for the District of New Mexico
Marokus v. United State
as 14-6199
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROY MAROKUS, Colonel (retired) MD
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
GEORGE MALATINSZKY, MD, ALEX LOVE and VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER OF OKLAHOMA CITY
Wright v. United States
as 14-7064
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOEY WRIGHT, as next of kin for K.B., a minor
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Nelson, et al v. United State
as 14-1322
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JAMES NELSON and ELIZABETH VARNEY
Defendant - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
