Cases 51 - 60 of 776
Harris v. City Cycle Sales
as 23-3116
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JEREMY L. HARRIS
Defendant / Appellant:
CITY CYCLE SALES, INC.
Saxena v. Allen
as 23-1212
Counter Defendant:
GRANT MITCHELL SAXENA
Counter Claimant:
JEFFERY THOMAS ALLEN
Bradshaw, et al v. American Airlines, et al
as 23-5074
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEBORAH BRADSHAW and CHRYSTAL ANTAO
Defendant / Appellee:
AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. and MESA AIRLINES, INC.
Ngiendo v. First Transit, et al
as 23-3106
Plaintiff / Appellant:
QUINN NGIENDO
Defendant / Appellee:
FIRST TRANSIT, INC. and GALLAGHER BASSETT SERVICES, INC.
Ngiendo v. First Transit
as 23-3107
Plaintiff / Appellant:
QUINN NGIENDO
Defendant / Appellee:
FIRST TRANSIT, INC.
Waller v. Waller
as 23-3077
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL T. WALLER
Defendant / Appellee:
DOLLY ARDONA WALLER, AKA Dolly A. Mitchell
Pazos v. Tungston Heavy Powder, Inc., et al
as 23-8030
Plaintiff / Appellee:
GEORGE PAZOS
Defendant / Appellant:
TUNGSTON HEAVY POWDER, INC., DBA Tungsten Heavy Powder and Parts, Inc., TUNGSTEN PARTS WYOMING, INC., RUSSELL LEWIS and others
Defendant:
JOSEPH SEROV, AKA Joseph Sery
Coomer v. Make Your Life Epic, et al
as 23-1109
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ERIC COOMER, Ph. D.
Defendant / Appellant:
MAKE YOUR LIFE EPIC LLC, DBA Thrive Time Show and CLAYTON THOMAS CLARK
Lopez (Hunt) v. Cantex Health Care Centers II, et al
as 23-2041
Plaintiff / Appellee:
TODD LOPEZ, as personal representative of the wrongful death estatae of Eva Hunt
Defendant / Appellant:
CANTEX HEALTH CARE CENTERS II, LLC and FARMINGTON HEALTH CARE CENTER, LTD CO., DBA Cedar Ridge Inn
Lopez (Lewis) v. Cantex Health Care Centers II, et al
as 23-2044
Plaintiff / Appellee:
TODD LOPEZ, as Personal Representative of the Wrongful Death Estate of Clara Mae Cook
Defendant / Appellant:
CANTEX HEALTH CARE CENTERS II, LLC and FARMINGTON HEALTH CARE CENTER, LTD CO., DBA Cedar Ridge Inn
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
