Labor Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 461
L. v. Anthem Blue Cross Life and Health Insurance, et al
as 24-4064
Plaintiff: L.L., individually and on behalf of J.L. a minor
Defendant: ANTHEM BLUE CROSS LIFE AND HEALTH INSURANCE COMPANY and DLA PIPER WELFARE BENEFIT PLAN
S.F., et al v. Cigna Health and Life Insurance Company, et al
as 24-4062
Plaintiff: S.F., E.F., J.S. and others
Defendant: CIGNA HEALTH AND LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, CIGNA BEHAVIORAL HEALTH, SLALOM INC. HEALTHCARE BENEFIT PLAIN and others
Kimble v. EOG Resources
as 24-2085
Plaintiff: STEVEN KIMBLE
Defendant: EOG RESOURCES, INC.
Intervenor: BEDROCK PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS, LLC
Little v. Wendy's International
as 24-1232
Plaintiff: JEFFREY LITTLE, individually and on behalf of all similarly situated persons
Defendant: WENDY'S INTERNATIONAL, LLC
J.H., et al v. Anthem Blue Cross Life and Health Insurance
as 24-4052
Plaintiff: J.H. and A.H.
Defendant: ANTHEM BLUE CROSS LIFE AND HEALTH INSURANCE
Cochran v. Hewlett-Packard Company, et al
as 24-1151
Plaintiff: DANIEL COCHRAN
Defendant: HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, HP ENTERPRISE SERVICES, LLC, HEWLETT-PACKARD ENTERPRISE CO. and others
Sparrow v. UMR, et al
as 24-1118
Plaintiff: RACHEL SPARROW, Individually and on behalf of her minor child, H.S.
Defendant: UMR, INC., THE AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. HEALTH AND WELFARE PLAN FOR ACTIVE EMPLOYEES and AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC.
Dahl v. Petroplex Acidizing
as 24-2038
Plaintiff: DARVIN DAHL, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated
Defendant: PETROPLEX ACIDIZING, INC.
Su v. Ascent Construction, et al
as 24-4025
Plaintiff: JULIE A. SU, Acting Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor
Defendant: ASCENT CONSTRUCTION, INC., a Utah corporation, BRADLEY L. KNOWLTON, an individual, ASCENT CONSTRUCTION, INC. EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN, an employee benefit plan and others
Smith v. Aetna
as 24-1065
Plaintiff: MATTHEW ALAN SMITH
Defendant: AETNA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?