Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Trustee of the Utah Carpenters, et al v. Loveridge, et al
as 13-4120
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellee:
TRUSTEE OF THE UTAH CARPENTERS' AND CEMENT MASONS' PENSIONS TRUST and UTAH CARPENTERS AND CEMENT MASONS' PENSION TRUST FUND
Defendant - Appellant:
ELIZABETH LOVERIDGE, Trustee for Perry Olsein Drywall, Inc.
Defendant-Counter-Claimant:
NEW STAR GENERAL CONTRACTORS, a Utah corporation, CULP CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, a Utah coproration and OKLAND CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, a Utah Corporation
Trustee of the Utah Carpenters, et al v. Loveridge, et al
as 13-4025
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellee:
TRUSTEE OF THE UTAH CARPENTERS' AND CEMENT MASONS' PENSIONS TRUST and UTAH CARPENTERS AND CEMENT MASONS' PENSION TRUST FUND
Defendant - Appellant:
ELIZABETH LOVERIDGE, Trustee for Perry Olsein Drywall, Inc.
Defendant-Counter-Claimant:
NEW STAR GENERAL CONTRACTORS, a Utah corporation, CULP CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, a Utah coproration and OKLAND CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, a Utah Corporation
24 Hour Fitness USA v. Masone
as 13-1062
Plaintiff - Appellant:
24 HOUR FITNESS USA, INC., a California corporation, DBA 24 Hour Fitness
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTIE MASONE
Trustees of the Colo. Cement, et al v. M&R Concrete, et al
as 13-1039
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TRUSTEES OF THE COLORADO CEMENT MASONS PENSION TRUST FUND, TRUSTEES OF THE COLORADO CEMENT MASONS APPRENTICE TRUST FUND and TRUSTEES OF THE COLORADO LABORERS HEALTH AND WELFARE TRUST FUND
Plaintiff:
TRUSTEES OF THE COLORADO CEMENT MASONS' JOINT APPRENTICESHIP TRUST FUND and TRUSTEES OF THE OPERATIVE PLASTERERS & CEMENT MASONS HEALTH BENEFIT FUND
Defendant - Appellee:
M&R CONCRETE, INC., a Colorado corporation and M&R FLATWORK, INC., a Colorado corporation
Allen, et al v. BHP Navajo Coal Company, et al
as 11-2069
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DOMMICITA ALLEN, BRIAN ALLISON, DUANNE ALLISON and others
Defendant - Appellant:
BHP NAVAJO COAL COMPANY and SAN JUAN COAL COMPANY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
