Cases 11 - 16 of 16
State of Colorado v. EPA, et al
as 20-1262
Intervenor Defendant:
NATIONAL STONE, SAND, AND GRAVEL ASSOCIATION, NATIONAL MINING ASSOCIATION, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF HOME BUILDERS and others
Defendant:
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, ANDREW WHEELER, in his official capacity as Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
THE STATE OF COLORADO
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
CHANTELL SACKETT and MICHAEL SACKETT
Amicus Curiae:
NEW MEXICO ACEQUIA ASSOCIATION, NAVAJO NATION, GILA RESOURCES INFORMATION PROJECT and others
Petitioner:
INSTITUTE FOR POLICY INTEGRITY AT NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW and THE INSTITUTE FOR POLICY INTEGRITY AT NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW
State of Colorado v. EPA, et al
as 20-1238
Defendant / Appellant:
ANDREW WHEELER, in his official capacity as Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, R.D. JAMES, in his official capacity as Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works, U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
THE STATE OF COLORADO
Amicus Curiae:
NEW MEXICO ACEQUIA ASSOCIATION, NAVAJO NATION, INSTITUTE FOR POLICY INTEGRITY AT NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW and others
Intervenor Defendant:
U.S. POULTRY & EGG ASSOCIATION, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF HOME BUILDERS, LEADING BUILDERS OF AMERICA and others
Petitioner:
MICHAEL SACKETT, CHANTELL SACKETT and THE INSTITUTE FOR POLICY INTEGRITY AT NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW
Wildgrass Oil and Gas v. State of Colorado, et al
as 20-1151
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFFREY ROBBINS, in his official capacity as Director of the Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission, COLORADO OIL AND GAS CONSERVATION COMMISSION, JARED POLIS, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Colorado and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILDGRASS OIL AND GAS COMMITTEE
Intervenor:
AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE and COLORADO OIL AND GAS ASSOCIATION
Dine Citizens, et al v. Jewell, et al
as 15-2130
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DINE CITIZENS AGAINST RUINING OUR ENVIRONMENT, SAN JUAN CITIZENS ALLIANCE, WILDEARTH GUARDIANS and others
Defendant - Appellee:
SALLY JEWELL, in her official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, an agency within the United States Department of the Interior and NEIL KORNZE, in his official capacity as Director of the United States Bureau of Land Management
Defendant Intervenor - Appellee:
WPX ENERGY PRODUCTION, LLC, ENCANA OIL & GAS (USA), INC., BP AMERICA PRODUCTION COMPANY and others
Sierra Club, et al v. Bostick, et al
as 14-6099
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SIERRA CLUB, INC., CLEAN ENERGY FUTURE OKLAHOMA and EAST TEXAS SUB REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS P. BOSTICK, in his official capacity as Commanding General and Chief of Engineers of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, MICHAEL J. WALSH, in his official capacity as U.S. Army Commanding General for Civil and Emergency Operations, MICHAEL TEAGUE, in his official capacity as Tulsa District Commander of U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and others
Intervenor - Appellee:
TRANSCANADA KEYSTONE PIPELINE LP, TRANSCANADA CORPORATION, INTERSTATE NATURAL GAS ASSOCIATION and others
Sierra Club, et al v. Bostick, et al
as 12-6201
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SIERRA CLUB, INC., CLEAN ENERGY FUTURE OKLAHOMA and EAST TEXAS SUB REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS P. BOSTICK, in his official capacity as Commanding General and Chief of Engineers of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, MICHAEL J. WALSH, in his official capacity as U.S. Army Commanding General for Civil and Emergency Operations, MICHAEL TEAGUE, in his official capacity as Tulsa District Commander of U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and others
Intervenor:
TRANSCANADA KEYSTONE PIPELINE LP, TRANSCANADA CORPORATION, INTERSTATE NATURAL GAS ASSOCIATION and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
