Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Cases 11 - 20 of 88
Western Watersheds Project, et al v. United States Bureau of Land Management, et al
as 22-8022
Petitioner / Appellant: WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY and UPPER GREEN RIVER ALLIANCE
Respondent / Appellee: UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, WILLIAM PERRY PENDLEY, in his official capacity as Deputy Director of the U.S. Bureau of Land Management, JONAH ENERGY, LLC and others
Bradford, et al v. U.S. Department of Labor, et al
as 22-1023
Plaintiff / Appellant: DUKE BRADFORD, ARKANSAS VALLEY ADVENTURES, LLC, AKA AVA Rafting and Zipline and COLORADO RIVER OUTFITTERS ASSOCIATION
Defendant / Appellee: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, WAGE AND HOUR DIVISION, JOSEPH R. BIDEN, President of the United States and others
Amicus Curiae: ECONOMIC POLICY INSTITUTE, NATIONAL EMPLOYMENT LAW PROJECT, NATIONAL ABILITY CENTER and others
Petitioner: SAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL
API, et al v. U.S. Department of Interior, et al
as 21-8077
Petitioner: AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE, CLOUD PEAK ENERGY, INC., NATIONAL MINING ASSOCIATION and others
Respondent: NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, POWDER RIVER BASIN RESOURCE COUNCIL, THE WILDERNESS SOCIETY and others
American Petroleum, et al v. U.S. Department of Interior, et al
as 21-8076
Petitioner / Appellant: AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE
Petitioner: CLOUD PEAK ENERGY, INC., NATIONAL MINING ASSOCIATION, WYOMING MINING ASSOCIATION and others
Respondent / Appellee: NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, POWDER RIVER BASIN RESOURCE COUNCIL, THE WILDERNESS SOCIETY and others
Wasatch Transportation v. Forest River
as 21-4107
Plaintiff / Appellant: WASATCH TRANSPORTATION, INC.
Defendant / Appellee: FOREST RIVER, INC., DBA Glaval Bus
Center for Biological, et al v. US Department of the Interior, et al
as 21-4098
Plaintiff / Appellant: CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, LIVING RIVERS, COLORADO RIVERKEEPER and others
Defendant / Appellee: US DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and US BUREAU OF RECLAMATION
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: WASHINGTON COUNTY WATER CONSERVANCY DISTRICT
Intervenor: STATE OF UTAH and UTAH BOARD OF WATER RESOURCES
Save The Colorado, et al v. Spellmon, et al
as 21-1155
Petitioner / Appellant: LIVING RIVERS, a nonprofit corporation, THE ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP, a Colorado nonprofit corporation, SAVE THE COLORADO, a Colorado nonprofit corporation and others
Respondent / Appellee: LIEUTENANT GENERAL SCOTT A SPELLMON, in his official capacity as the Chief of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, MARTHA WILLIAMS, in her official capacity as the Principal Deputy Director, exercising the authority of Acting Director of the U.S. Fish and WIldlife Service and DEBRA HAALAND, in her offical capacity as Secretary of the Interior
Intervenor / Appellee: CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, acting by and through its Board of Water Commissioners (Denver Water)
Save The Colorado, et al v. United States, et al
as 21-1036
Plaintiff / Appellant: SIERRA CLUB, WILDEARTH GUARDIANS, SAVE THE POUDRE: POUDRE WATERKEEPER and others
Defendant / Appellee: COLORADO RIVER WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF RECLAMATION and UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: MUNICIPAL SUBDISTRICT, NORTHERN COLORADO WATER CONSERVANCY DISTRICT, CITY AND COUNTY OF BROOMFIELD COLORADO and COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
United States v. Walsh We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-8074
Defendant / Appellant: RIVER DEAN WALSH
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Swomley, et al v. Schroyer, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-1335
Petitioner / Appellant: TOM STEWART, ERIC VOTH, SARAH SWOMLEY and others
Respondent / Appellee: KAREN SCHROYER, in her official capacity as District Ranger, Aspen-Sopris Ranger District, White River National Forest, United States Forest Service and UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, a federal agency of the United States Department of Agriculture

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?