Cases 31 - 40 of 210
Standing Akimbo, et al v. United States
as 21-1379
Petitioner / Appellant:
STANDING AKIMBO, INC., a Colorado corporation, SPENCER KIRSON, SAMANTHA MURPHY and others
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, through its agency the Internal Revenue Service
Minemyer v. CIR
as 21-9006
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN THOMAS MINEMYER
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Olsen, et al v. CIR
as 21-9005
Petitioner / Appellant:
PRESTON OLSEN and ELIZABETH OLSEN
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Johnson v. CIR
as 21-9004
Petitioner / Appellant:
THERON E. JOHNSON
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Blake, et al v. CIR
as 21-9003
Petitioner / Appellant:
BRADEN B. BLAKE and KRISTEN S. BLAKE
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Marshall v. English, et al
as 21-3101
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN DOE (4), Blind IRS Employee/Undercover Person, in his individual and official capacity, TOMMIE TURNER, Client/Associate/Stakeholder-Wizard Services/Joe Marshall's Companies, in his individual capacity, Estate of Travis Johnson, JOHN CORNELIUS, IRS Special Agent, Criminal Investigation Division, Austin, Texas, in his individual capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JONATHAN MARSHALL, SR.
Hohl, et al v. CIR
as 21-9002
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL HOHL and JENNIFER PARKER HOHL
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Johnson v. CIR
as 21-9001
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Petitioner / Appellant:
THERON E. JOHNSON
Gillies v. CIR
as 21-9000
Petitioner / Appellant:
TOI GILLIES
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Schoppe v. State of Utah, et al
as 20-4111
Defendant / Appellee:
WORKFORCE SERVICES, STATE OF UTAH, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN H. SCHOPPE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
