Cases 1 - 10 of 10
In re: Motor Fuel Temperature, et al
as 15-3227
Plaintiff - Appellee:
IN RE: MOTOR FUEL TEMPERATURE SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION, ZACHARY WILSON, MATHEW COOK and others
Defendant - Appellant:
CIRCLE K STORES, INC, PILOT TRAVEL CENTERS, LLC, KUM&GO, L.C. and others
Defendant Third-Party Defendant:
MOTIVA ENTERPRISES, LLC
Defendant:
BP CORPORATION NORTH AMERICA, INC., CASEY'S GENERAL STORE, INC., CHEVRON USA, INC. and others
In re: Motor Fuel Temperature, et al
as 15-3228
Plaintiff - Appellee:
IN RE: MOTOR FUEL TEMPERATURE SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION, ZACHARY WILSON, MATHEW COOK and others
Defendant Third-Party Defendant:
MOTIVA ENTERPRISES, LLC
Defendant:
BP CORPORATION NORTH AMERICA, INC., CASEY'S GENERAL STORE, INC., CHEVRON USA, INC. and others
In re: Motor Fuel Temperature, et al
as 15-3221
Plaintiff - Appellee:
IN RE: MOTOR FUEL TEMPERATURE SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION, ZACHARY WILSON, MATHEW COOK and others
Defendant - Appellant:
CIRCLE K STORES, INC, PILOT TRAVEL CENTERS, LLC, KUM&GO, L.C. and others
Defendant Third-Party Defendant:
MOTIVA ENTERPRISES, LLC
Defendant:
BP CORPORATION NORTH AMERICA, INC., CASEY'S GENERAL STORE, INC., CHEVRON USA, INC. and others
Chevron USA, Inc. v. Timm
as 10-1573
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CHEVRON USA, INC., a Pennsylvania corporation
Defendant-Third-Party-Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORY D. TIMM, a Colorado resident
Defendant:
CARY L. CARPENTER, a Colorado resident and ALLEN VAN WYHE, a Colorado resident
Third-Party-Defendant:
CHEVRON TCI, INC., a California corporation
In re: Motor Fuel Temperature, et al
as 10-602
:
7-ELEVEN, INC., , and others
Petitioner:
CIRCLE K STORES, INC, KUM&GO, L.C., QUICKTRIP CORPORATION and others
Respondent:
3 GIRLS ENTERPRISES, INC., SAMANTHA BAYLARD, KENNETH BECKER and others
Trans-Western Petroleum v. United States Gypsum Co., et al
as 08-4121
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellant:
TRANS-WESTERN PETROLEUM, a Colorado corporation
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellee:
CHEVRON USA, INC., a Pennsylvania corporation, WOLVERINE GAS AND OIL, a Michigan corporation, WINN EXPLORATION, a Texas corporation and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES GYPSUM CO., an Illinois corporation
Trans-Western Petroleum v. Wolverine Gas and Oil, et al
as 08-4120
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellee:
TRANS-WESTERN PETROLEUM, a Colorado corporation
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellant:
WOLVERINE GAS AND OIL, a Michigan corporation, CHEVRON USA, INC., a Pennsylvania corporation, WINN EXPLORATION, a Texas corporation and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES GYPSUM CO., an Illinois corporation
Wason Ranch Corporation v. Hecla Mining Company, et al
as 08-1181
Plaintiff - Appellee:
WASON RANCH CORPORATION
Defendant - Appellant:
CHEVRON USA, INC., a Pennsylvania corporation, individually, as parent, and as successor in interest to, DBA Chevron Resources Company, a division of, DBA Chevron Industries, Inc.
Defendant:
HOMESTAKE MINING COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, a California corporation, TY POXSON, an individual and HECLA MINING COMPANY, a Delaware corporation
Wason Ranch Corporation v. Hecla Mining Company, et al
as 08-1180
Plaintiff - Appellee:
WASON RANCH CORPORATION
Defendant - Appellant:
HECLA MINING COMPANY, a Delaware corporation
Defendant:
HOMESTAKE MINING COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, a California corporation, CHEVRON USA, INC., a Pennsylvania corporation, individually, as parent, and as successor in interest to, DBA Chevron Resources Company, a division of, DBA Chevron Industries, Inc. and TY POXSON, an individual
Wason Ranch Corporation v. Hecla Mining Company, et al
as 08-1157
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WASON RANCH CORPORATION
Defendant - Appellee:
HECLA MINING COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, HOMESTAKE MINING COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, a California corporation, CHEVRON USA, INC., a Pennsylvania corporation, individually, as parent, and as successor in interest to Chevron Resources Company, a division of Chevron Industries, Inc. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
