Cases 1 - 10 of 403
Heather Tyler (PS) v. Harrison et al
as 1:2024cv02388
Defendant:
Tkg-Storagemart and Thomas M Harrison
Plaintiff:
Heather Tyler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Groff v. Groff
as 1:2024cv00188
Defendant:
Richard Michael Groff
Plaintiff:
Nichole M Groff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
DooVoo Trust and Holdings et al v. Bank of the West et al
as 5:2024cv00973
Defendant:
BMO Bank, Don Timberlake, Sheila Stinson and others
Plaintiff:
DeAngelo Sherfield, ICandee and DooVoo Trust and Holdings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Wallace Family Enterprises LLC v. Zeroholding LLC et al
as 5:2024cv00915
Defendant:
Philip Miles and Zeroholding LLC
Plaintiff:
Wallace Family Enterprises LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Breach of Contract- Insurance
Manske et al v. Rekate et al
as 2:2024cv00143
Plaintiff:
John Manske and Yvonne Banks
Defendant:
Advisor One LLC, Roger Rekate and Advisor Ink Financial doing business as Daring to Dream Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Russell v. Richison et al
as 5:2024cv00502
Defendant:
Paycom Software Inc, Felicia Williams, Henry C. Duques and others
Plaintiff:
Ryan Russell
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Angel v. Richison et al
as 5:2024cv00458
Plaintiff:
Kandy Angel
Defendant:
Chad Richison, Henry C. Duques, Robert J. Levenson and others
Moon v. Richison et al
as 5:2024cv00240
Plaintiff:
Chesley Moon
Defendant:
Chad Richison, Henry C. Duques, Robert J. Levenson and others
Minarik et al v. Paycom Software Inc et al
as 5:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
Joseph Minarik
Defendant:
Paycom Software Inc, Chad Richison and Craig Boelte
Petitioner:
Calvin E Mein
Ventrillo et al v. Paycom Software Inc et al
as 5:2023cv01019
Plaintiff:
Andelo Ventrillo, Jr.
Defendant:
Paycom Software Inc, Chad Richison and Craig Boelte
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
