Cases 11 - 16 of 16
Bank of America et al v. Bostwick et al
as 2:2011cv00867
Plaintiff:
Bank of America and ReconTrust
Defendant:
Richard L. Bostwick and Preston Rio Lister
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. Copar Pumice Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv01201
Plaintiff:
United States of America, United States of America and United States of America
Defendant:
Copar Pumice Company, Inc., Kelly Armstrong, Richard P Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Trespass on Public Land
Winkler et al v. Kenfield et al
as 1:2008cv01144
Plaintiff:
Richard A. Winkler, Richard A. Winkler, Richard A. Winkler and others
Defendant:
Dennis Kenfield and High Velocity Ranch, LLC
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Beneficial Investment v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 5:2008cv00360
Plaintiff:
Beneficial Investment, Michael Blair, Denise Blair and others
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: Diversity
State of Utah, et al v. United States, et al
as 06-4062
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STATE OF UTAH
Plaintiff-Intervenor - Appellee:
NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY, GREAT SALT LAKE AUDUBON, UTAH COUNCIL OF TROUT UNLIMITED and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, BLM, BLM, THE UNITED STATES BUREAU OF RECLAMATION and others
Defendant - Appellant:
CLINGER FAMILY PARTNERSHIP
St UT v. USA, et al
as 2:1997cv00927
Plaintiff:
State of Utah
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Department of the Interior , United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation and others
Counter_claimant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Department of the Interior , United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation and others
Counter_defendant:
State of Utah
Intervenor_plaintiff:
National Audubon Society , Great Salt Lake Audubon , Utah Council of Trout Unlimited and others
Pecial_master:
Michael Goldsmith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
