Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Myers, et al v. Wells Fargo Bank
as 16-6316
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONNY W. MYERS and BRENDA J. MYERS
Defendant - Appellee:
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Trustee for Certificate Holders of Bears Stearns Asset-Backed Securities Trust 2005-1, Asset- Backed Certificates, Series 2005-1,
Commonwealth Property Advocates et al v. Bank of New York Mellon, The et al
as 2:2011cv00575
Plaintiff:
Commonwealth Property Advocates and Daniel Labrum
Defendant:
Bank of New York Mellon, The , Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2007-9 , Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Crisp v. Innovative Mortgage Capital et al
as 2:2011cv00491
Plaintiff:
Clarissa Crisp
Defendant:
Innovative Mortgage Capital, Bank of America , BAC Home Loans Servicing and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Scarborough v. LaSalle Bank, et al
as 11-4092
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHAD D. SCARBOROUGH
Defendant - Appellee:
LASALLE BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee for First Franklin Mortgage Loan Trust, Mortgage Loan Asset-Backed Certificates Series 2007 FF 2, MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS and FIRST FRANKLIN FINANCIAL
Jespersen v. Bank of America et al
as 2:2010cv00390
Plaintiff:
Brett A. Jespersen
Defendant:
Bank of America, Bank of New York Mellon, The, Asset Backed Certificates and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Commonwealth Property Advocates v. Bank of New York Mellon, The et al
as 2:2010cv00033
Plaintiff:
Commonwealth Property Advocates
Defendant:
Bank of New York Mellon, The, Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2007-9, Recontrust and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Crespin v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A. et al
as 1:2008cv02713
Plaintiff:
Alan Crespin
Defendant:
HSBC Bank USA, N.A., Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2006-HE3, Nomura Home Equity Loan, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
