Assault, Libel, and Slander Cases filed in Utah
Cases 101 - 110 of 125
Maez v. Arnold et al
as 2:2007cv00550
Plaintiff: Michael Lee Maez
Defendant: John Arnold and Mary Ella Arnold
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Nemelka v. Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints. et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2007cv00524
Plaintiff: Christopher M. Nemelka
Defendant: Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints., Jeffrey R. Holland, Russell M. Ballard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Knudson v. Wal-Mart Stores
as 1:2007cv00085
Plaintiff: Jay Knudson
Defendant: Wal-Mart Stores and Wal-Mart Stores
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Libel,Assault,Slander
Karls v. Prudential Real Estate Affiliates et al
as 2:2007cv00325
Plaintiff: John S. Karls
Defendant: Prudential Real Estate Affiliates, Prudential Utah Real Estate I, Dan Colfack and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Schweitzer v. Shango
as 2:2007cv00268
Plaintiff: George L. Schweitzer
Defendant: FNU Shango
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
USANA Health Sciences v. Minkow et al
as 2:2007cv00159
Plaintiff: USANA Health Sciences, USANA Health Sciences, USANA Health Sciences and others
Defendant: Barry Minkow, Barry Minkow, Fraud Discovery Institute and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Sorenson's Ranch School et al v. My Space
as 2:2006cv00632
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Seymour et al v. Morrison et al
as 2:2006cv00426
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Shelton v. Gordon
as 2:2005cv00929
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Mahoney et al v. Christensen
as 2:2005cv00528
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?