Cases 21 - 30 of 846,860
Milord v. Nationwide Tax Pro Inc et al
as 0:2024cv62120
Defendant:
Nationwide Tax Pro Inc and Camilo Soto Restrepo
Plaintiff:
Rose Dadley Milord
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Quisenberry v. Gravitas LLC
as 8:2024cv02608
Defendant:
Gravitas LLC
Plaintiff:
Stephen Quisenberry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv02038
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv02043
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Maritime Subsidy Board
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv02609
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv02611
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Novo Nordisk A/S et al v. Island Dermatology LLC d/b/a Koru Medical Spa
as 1:2024cv00484
Defendant:
Island Dermatology LLC d/b/a Koru Medical Spa
Plaintiff:
Novo Nordisk Inc. and Novo Nordisk A/S
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Novo Nordisk A/S et al v. Island Dermatology LLC d/b/a Koru Medical Spa
as 1:2024cv00485
Plaintiff:
Novo Nordisk A/S and Novo Nordisk Inc.
Defendant:
Island Dermatology LLC d/b/a Koru Medical Spa
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Merheb v. The Home Depot et al
as 1:2024cv11552
Defendant:
The Home Depot and The Home Depot USA Inc.
Plaintiff:
Robert S Merheb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv11523
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
