Cases 21 - 30 of 76
Pate v. Warden of FCI Eng. et al
as 1:2017cv02129
Petitioner:
Frank Edwin Pate
Respondent:
Warden of FCI Eng., Director of BOP, President of the United States and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Williams v. United States Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2017cv02063
Petitioner:
Carlin Q. Williams
Respondent:
United States Bureau of Prisons and Joe Moorehead
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Baray-Pinela v. United States of America
as 1:2016cv03214
Petitioner:
Sergio Baray-Pinela
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Morris v. United States et al
as 1:2016cv02390
Petitioner:
John O. Morris
Respondent:
United States and Attorney General of the United States, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. United States Probation Officer for the District of Colorado et al
as 1:2016cv01907
Petitioner:
Jason Joseph Smith
Respondent:
United States Probation Officer for the District of Colorado and Scott Kirsch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Emert v. People of the United States of America
as 1:2016cv00493
Petitioner:
William A. Emert
Respondent:
People of the United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ontiveros v. United States Probation Department
as 1:2016cv00381
Petitioner:
Tito Ontiveros
Respondent:
United States Probation Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mickles v. Rose et al
as 1:2016cv00208
Petitioner:
Terrell Mickles
Respondent:
Rose and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bruscino v. True et al
as 1:2015cv02845
Petitioner:
Ronnie Bruscino
Respondent:
True and United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Scott v. United States Government et al
as 1:2015cv02857
Petitioner:
Garry Don Scott, Jr.
Respondent:
United States Government and State of Oklahoma, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
