Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Hale-El (PS) v. Florres et al
as 1:2024cv00435
Petitioner:
Colby Jerome Hale-El
Respondent:
Ryan Flores, Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The and Ryan Florres
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ruffin (PS) v. Flores
as 1:2023cv03183
Petitioner:
David Antonio Ruffin
Respondent:
Ryan Flores
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burnham (PS) v. Flores et al
as 1:2023cv02193
Petitioner:
Arthur Burnham
Respondent:
Flores and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Flores-Guerrero v. Quick et al
as 5:2023cv00196
Petitioner:
Pedro Flores-Guerrero
Respondent:
Christie Quick and Oklahoma Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (state)
Grey v. Polis et al
as 1:2021cv02622
Petitioner:
Christopher J. Grey and Christopher J. Kitrin
Respondent:
Jared Polis, Dean Williams, Caley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Flores v. Bourne et al
as 1:2020cv01028
Petitioner:
Dan Flores
Respondent:
Robin Bourne, State of New Mexico and John Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Alba v. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2020cv00074
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The and Department of Homeland Security
Petitioner:
Jose Alejandro Flore Alba
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Esquer v. Flores et al
as 2:2019cv00533
Respondent:
Estevan Flores and New Mexico Attorney General
Petitioner:
Markos Esquer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Quezada v. USA
as 1:2019cv01176
Petitioner:
Jose Alfredo Flores Quezada
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Flores (ID 0108600) v. Kansas, State of
as 5:2018cv03184
Respondent:
Kansas, State of
Petitioner:
Jennifer Lynn Flores
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
