Cases 31 - 40 of 75
Davis v. Lane et al
as 5:2014cv00078
Plaintiff:
Anthony E Davis
Defendant:
Reece Lane, Oklahoma State of and Dee Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watkins v. Lane et al
as 5:2014cv00079
Plaintiff:
John Micheal Watkins
Defendant:
Reese Lane and Oklahoma State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bledsoe v. Nash et al
as 5:2014cv00080
Plaintiff:
Demarco D Bledsoe
Defendant:
Steven G Nash, William Lane Fitz, Richard Stephens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maxwell v. Lane et al
as 5:2014cv00050
Plaintiff:
Carlos Terrill Maxwell
Defendant:
Reece Lane, Oklahoma State of and Matthew Hudson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phelps v. Lane et al
as 5:2014cv00049
Plaintiff:
Markeese Krea Shawn Phelps
Defendant:
Reece Lane, Oklahoma State of and John TV.com
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Oklahoma State of et al
as 5:2013cv00177
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Johnson
Defendant:
Oklahoma State of and Reese Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maxwell v. Oklahoma State of et al
as 5:2013cv00093
Plaintiff:
Carlos Terrill Maxwell
Defendant:
Oklahoma State of and Reese Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prather v. Payne County Correctional Center et al
as 5:2013cv00020
Plaintiff:
Shan Darntanquian Prather
Defendant:
Payne County Correctional Center and Reese Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prather v. Payne County Sheriff's Office et al
as 5:2012cv01226
Plaintiff:
Shan Darntanquian Prather
Defendant:
Payne County Sheriff's Office and Reese Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prather v. Payne County Correctional Officers et al
as 5:2012cv01225
Plaintiff:
Shan Darntanquian Prather
Defendant:
Payne County Correctional Officers and Reese Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
