Cases 41 - 50 of 175
Hale v. Marques et al
as 1:2019cv00752
Defendant:
Rudy Marques, Christopher Synsvoll, D. Humphries and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew J.D. Hale
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morgan v. United States et al
as 5:2019cv00135
Defendant:
Governor of Oklahoma, Oklahoma State of, Federal Bureau of Indians and others
Plaintiff:
David Brian Morgan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morgan v. United States et al
as 5:2018cv01064
Defendant:
Governor of Oklahoma, Oklahoma County Prosecutor, United States of America and others
Plaintiff:
David Brian Morgan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stine v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2018cv01331
Plaintiff:
Mikeal Glenn Stine
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, Mary M. Mitchell, Sara Revell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vitrano v. United States Attorney General et al
as 1:2018cv00859
Plaintiff:
Thomas P. Vitrano
Defendant:
United States Attorney General, Federal Bureau of Prisons, United States Marshals Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Njos v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2018cv00567
Plaintiff:
Scott Joseph Njos
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bridges v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2018cv00494
Plaintiff:
John Clark Bridges
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cole v. U.S Department of Justice et al.
as 1:2018cv00482
Plaintiff:
John Anthony Cole
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons, ADX Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Barnes et al v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, The et al
as 1:2018cv00245
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Barnes , David A. Banks , Demetrius K. Harper and others
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, The, C.R. Goetz, C.R. (I) Goetz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bruce v. Espinosa et al
as 1:2018cv00087
Plaintiff:
Antoine Bruce
Defendant:
C. Espinosa, N. Rudd, J. Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
