Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Jones v. Gill et al
as 2:2022cv00305
Plaintiff:
Eric Ison Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
Sim Gill, Brett Robinson and Tyson V. Hamilton
Not Classified By Court:
Prisoner Litigation Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamilton v. Department of Corrections Medical Department et al
as 2:2015cv00611
Plaintiff:
George Hamilton
Defendant:
Department of Corrections Medical Department, Sidney G. Roberts, Kennon Tubbs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton v. State of Utah et al
as 2:2015cv00344
Plaintiff:
Tony Alexander Hamilton
Defendant:
State of Utah and David J Angerhofer PC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bacon v. Hamilton et al
as 2:2015cv00179
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Bacon
Defendant:
Corie Hamilton, Christopher Jacobson and Nathan Lyon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bacon v. Bautista et al
as 2:2015cv00174
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Bacon
Defendant:
Rudy Bautista and Tyson V. Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bacon v. Mount et al
as 2:2015cv00163
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Bacon
Defendant:
Harry Mount, Cade Martin, Holly R. Shick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton v. Walters et al
as 2:2014cv00139
Plaintiff:
Tony Alexander Hamilton
Defendant:
Pete Walters, Scott L. Christensen, Alfred C. Bigelow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alvillar v. Garner et al
as 2:2009cv00659
Plaintiff:
Guido John Alvillar
Defendant:
Curtis L. Garner, Jesse Gallegos, Clark A. Harms and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wood v. Utah Board of Pardons and Parole et al
as 2:2009cv00643
Plaintiff:
Lance Conway Wood
Defendant:
Utah Board of Pardons and Parole, Keith Hamilton, Jesse Gallegos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pirela v. Carver et al
as 2:2008cv00556
Plaintiff:
Edwin Mitchell Pirela
Defendant:
Scott Carver, Mike Chabries, Lowell Clark and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
