Cases 1 - 10 of 1,760
Wright v. Lujan-Grisham et al
as 1:2024cv00549
Plaintiff:
Caleb Wright
Defendant:
Michelle Lujan-Grisham, Alisha Tafoya, FNU Wilkens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benavides v. Lujan-Grisham et al
as 1:2024cv00550
Plaintiff:
Eric Benavides
Defendant:
Michelle Lujan-Grisham, Alisha Tafoya, FNU Wilkens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blanford v. Wilkens et al
as 1:2024cv00551
Plaintiff:
Joe Blanford
Defendant:
FNU Wilkens, GCCF, Jacob LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keraghan v. Tafoya
as 1:2024cv00552
Plaintiff:
Robert Keraghan
Defendant:
Alisha Tafoya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harlan v. Tafoya et al
as 1:2024cv00553
Plaintiff:
Timothy Lavone Harlan
Defendant:
Alisha Tafoya and New Mexico Probation and Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vigil et al v. Wilkens et al
as 1:2024cv00522
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Vigil, Victor Montano, Jr., Isaiah Ulibarri and others
Defendant:
FNU Wilkens, FNU Jacobo and Alisha Tafoya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDonald v. Tafoya et al
as 1:2024cv00513
Plaintiff:
Jeremy McDonald
Defendant:
Alisha Tafoya and FNU Wilkens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mendez v. The New Mexico Corrections Department et al
as 2:2024cv00517
Plaintiff:
Mario A Mendez
Defendant:
The New Mexico Corrections Department, Geo Inc. and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DeHerrera et al v. GCCF
as 1:2024cv00518
Plaintiff:
Julian DeHerrera, Edwardo Jesus Casillas, Jarell Robinson and others
Defendant:
GCCF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. Tafoya et al
as 1:2024cv00515
Plaintiff:
Matthew Baker
Defendant:
Alisha Tafoya and New Mexico State Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
