Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Darcy v. New Vision Pizza LLC et al
as 5:2020cv01245
Defendant:
J&B Pizza Inc, New Vision Pizza LLC, Dan Fleck and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Darcy
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Blose v. JARINC, Ltd. et al
as 1:2018cv02184
Defendant:
John Doe Corp. 1-10, Joseph Romano, JARINC, Ltd. and others
Plaintiff:
Nathan Boles and Nathan Blose
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0206
Roybal et al v. Community Options, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00055
Plaintiff:
Anthony Roybal and Matthew Romero
Defendant:
Community Options, Inc., Robert Stack, Donald Hay and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Starns et al v. Christian Alcoholics & Addicts in Recovery, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv00574
Plaintiff:
Bodhi Chance Starns , Lucas Don Miller-Allen , Michael Travis Wyche and others
Defendant:
Christian Alcoholics & Addicts in Recovery, Inc. , Simmons Foods, Inc. , Simmons Pet Food, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Arnold v. Genghis Grill et al
as 4:2016cv00328
Plaintiff:
Courtnie Arnold
Defendant:
Genghis Grill, Genghis Grill International, LLC, Genghis Grill Franchise Concepts, LP and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Pretlow v. United States, et al
as 10-6220
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BARRY C. PRETLOW
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and JOHN DOES, 1-6
Pretlow v. Garrison, et al
as 10-6206
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BARRY C. PRETLOW
Defendant - Appellee:
SHAWN M. GARRISON, RAMON MARTINEZ, SCOTT JENNINGS and others
Pretlow v. Garrison et al
as 5:2010cv00675
Plaintiff:
Barry C Pretlow
Defendant:
Shawn M Garrison , Ramon G Martinez, Scott Jennings and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Ewert v. H2Oil Recovery Services Inc., et al
as 10-8048
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM H. EWERT
Defendant - Appellee:
H2OIL RECOVERY SERVICES INC., a Georgia corporation, 212RESOURCES, a fictitious business name for H2Oil Recovery Services Inc. and JOHN DOES 1-5
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
