Cases 21 - 30 of 47
Perez v. El Tequila, et al
as 16-5002
Plaintiff - Appellee:
THOMAS E. PEREZ, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor
Defendant - Appellant:
EL TEQUILA, LLC and CARLOS AGUIRRE, individually
Bracamontes et al v. Bimbo Bakeries USA INC
as 1:2015cv02324
Plaintiff:
Hector Bracamontes , Felipe Corrales-Guerrero , Adrian Davila and others
Defendant:
Bimbo Bakeries U.S.A. Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Perez v. Foreclosure Connection et al
as 2:2015cv00653
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
Foreclosure Connection and Jason Williams
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Perez v. Jeffs et al
as 2:2015cv00643
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
Lyle Jeffs, Dale Barlow and Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0206
Perez et al v. Fog River et al
as 2:2015cv00500
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez and United States Department of Labor
Defendant:
Fog River and John Bowen
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Perez v. Kasim
as 4:2015cv00392
Plaintiff:
Thomas E Perez
Defendant:
Isam Kasim
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Hong Kong Entertainment (Overseas) Investment, Ltd. et al v. Perez et al
as 1:2014cv00028
Plaintiff:
Hong Kong Entertainment (Overseas) Investment, Ltd. and Man Kwan
Defendant:
Thomas E. Perez, David Weil, Ruben Rosalez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Perez v. Dill
as 1:2014mc00044
Petitioner:
Thomas E. Perez
Respondent:
Walter Dill
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Huffman et al v. American Process Piping, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv02145
Plaintiff:
Shaun Huffman , Henry Perez , William Harding, IV and others
Defendant:
American Process Piping, Inc., Pamela Graves and Charles Smith
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Perez v. Stone Castle et al
as 1:2014cv00066
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
Stone Castle and Anthony Stoddard
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
