Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Grant et al v. Kingston et al
as 2:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
Amanda Rae Grant, Jenny Kingston, Jana Nicole Johnson and others
Defendant:
Paul Elden Kingston, John Daniel Kingston, Sr, Hyrum Dalton Kingston and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Waltrip et al v. Pilot Travel Centers, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv00643
Plaintiff:
Juston Waltrip, Jonathan Winckler, Sergio Olivas and others
Defendant:
Pilot Travel Centers, LLC and Pilot Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Young v. Baldwin Aviation, Inc.
as 1:2020cv02901
Defendant:
Baldwin Aviation, Inc., Baldwin Aviation, LLC, Baldwin Safety and Compliance and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher B. Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Castellano v. Brigham Young University et al
as 2:2016cv01205
Plaintiff:
Joseph Castellano
Defendant:
Brigham Young University, Scott Elkins and David Tueller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
Young v. Tulsa New Holland, Inc.
as 4:2013cv00661
Plaintiff:
Charles R Young
Defendant:
Tulsa New Holland, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Ekins v. Brigham Young University
as 2:2012cv00785
Plaintiff:
Brent Ekins
Defendant:
Brigham Young University
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4323
Young v. Tulsa Technology Center
as 4:2012cv00187
Plaintiff:
Monique Young
Defendant:
Tulsa Technology Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Avila v. Young Pecan Shelling Company,Inc
as 2:2010cv00221
Plaintiff:
Soilo Avila
Defendant:
Young Pecan Shelling Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Young v. Kempthorne
as 08-2230
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RODNEY H. YOUNG
Defendant - Appellee:
DICK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary, Department of the Interior
Young v. Department of Interior
as 1:2007cv00535
Plaintiff:
Rodney H Young
Defendant:
Department of Interior
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
