Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Hopkins, et al v. IRS, et al
as 08-2127
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHARON J. HOPKINS and MARK HOPKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, ACCU-RITE TAX SERVICE, INC., JENNIFER HAND and others
Terminated Case
as 1:2008cv00425
Petitioner:
Jeffrey T Maehr
Respondent:
Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Pragovich v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 1:2008cv00791
Petitioner:
George K. Pragovich
Respondent:
Internal Revenue Service, Joseph Conroy and Sam Anderson
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Good Karma Trading, LLC et al v. USA et al
as 1:2007cv01688
Petitioner:
Good Karma Trading, LLC, Blue Ash Trading, LLC, Beechwood Fund, LLC and others
Respondent:
USA, Department of the Treasury and Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609 IRS: Petition to Quash IRS Summons
Hopkins et al v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 6:2007cv00262
Plaintiff:
Sharon J Hopkins and Mark Hopkins
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service, Accu-Rite Tax Service, Inc., Jennifer Hand and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609 IRS: Petition to Quash IRS Summons
Hopkins et al v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 1:2007cv00262
Plaintiff:
Sharon J Hopkins and Mark Hopkins
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service, Accu-Rite Tax Service, Inc. and Jennifer Hand
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609 IRS: Petition to Quash IRS Summons
Hopkins et al v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 2:2007cv00262
Plaintiff:
Sharon J Hopkins and Mark Hopkins
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service, Accu-Rite Tax Service, Inc. and Jennifer Hand
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609 IRS: Petition to Quash IRS Summons
Stoffels v. Hegarty et al
as 1:2007cv00167
Petitioner:
Darrell Grant Stoffels
Respondent:
Patrick C. Hegarty, Internal Revenue Service, Commissioner of and Wells Fargo Bank
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609 IRS: Petition to Quash IRS Summons
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
