Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Alltel Corporation v. City of Sapulpa, Oklahoma et al
as 4:2024cv00192
Plaintiff:
Alltel Corporation doing business as Verizon Wireless
Defendant:
City of Sapulpa, Oklahoma, City Planning Commission of the City of Sapulpa, City Council of the City of Sapulpa and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1934
SBA Network Services, LLC v. City of Tulsa Board of Adjustment
as 4:2023cv00461
Plaintiff:
SBA Network Services LLC
Defendant:
City of Tulsa Board of Adjustment
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Matthews v. LVNV Funding LLC et al
as 5:2021cv00837
Plaintiff:
Jecorey Matthews
Defendant:
LVNV Funding LLC and National Credit Adjusters LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Bullock v. Knight Adjustment Bureau
as 1:2019cv00074
Plaintiff:
Heather Bullock
Defendant:
Knight Adjustment Bureau
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Sarber v. Communication Federal Credit Union et al
as 2:2018cv02507
Defendant:
Communication Federal Credit Union, Gregory D Bribiesca, Brantley & Brantley Adjusters, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Sarber
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Rabideau v. Knight Adjustment Bureau et al
as 2:2018cv00248
Plaintiff:
David Rabideau
Defendant:
Knight Adjustment Bureau and Jay V Barney PC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Roberts et al v. National Credit Adjusters
as 1:2017cv00054
Plaintiff:
Jay Roberts and Natasha Roberts
Defendant:
National Credit Adjusters
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Johnson v. National Credit Adjusters et al
as 2:2016cv00899
Plaintiff:
Flora Johnson
Defendant:
National Credit Adjusters and Summit Receivables
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Cookson v. Tulsa Adjustment Bureau, Inc.
as 4:2016cv00280
Plaintiff:
Catherine J Cookson
Defendant:
Tulsa Adjustment Bureau, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Bennett v. Knight Adjustment Bureau
as 2:2016cv00153
Plaintiff:
Brittany Bennett
Defendant:
Knight Adjustment Bureau
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
