Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Los Alamos Study Group v. United States Department of Energy et al
as 6:2011cv00946
Defendant:
United States Department of Energy , Steven Chu , National Nuclear Security Administration and others
Plaintiff:
Los Alamos Study Group
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
Los Alamos Study Group v. US Department of Energy, et al
as 11-2141
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOS ALAMOS STUDY GROUP
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, STEVEN CHU, in his capacity Secretary, Department of Energy, NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and others
Conejos County Clean Water, Inc. et al v. U.S. Department of Energy et al
as 1:2010cv02663
Plaintiff:
Conejos County Clean Water, Inc. , San Luis Valley Ecosystem Council and Concerned Citizens for Nuclear Safety
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration, Thomas P. D'Agostino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
The Los Alamos Study Group v. United States Department of Energy et al
as 1:2010cv00760
Defendant:
United States Department of Energy, Stephen Chu, National Nuclear Security Administration and others
Plaintiff:
The Los Alamos Study Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
Barry et al v. Castor
as 5:2010cv00661
Plaintiff:
Linda Barry , Thomas Barry and Charles Jacobs
Defendant:
Shane Castor
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319
San Juan Citizens Alliance, et al v. Stiles, et al
as 10-1259
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAN JUAN CITIZENS ALLIANCE, COLORADO ENVIRONMENTAL COALITION, COLORADO WILD and others
Defendant - Appellee:
MARK STILES, in his official capacity as San Juan National Forest Supervisor and BLM Center Manager of the San Juan Public Lands Center, RICK CABLES, in his official capacity as Regional Forester of the Rocky Mountain Region of the U.S. Forest Service, UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE and others
Defendant-Intervenor - Appellee:
BP AMERICA PRODUCTION COMPANY, ELM RIDGE EXPLORATION COMPANY, LLC, EXOK, INC. and others
USA v. Lake Fork Resorts LLC et al
as 1:2009cv01967
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Lake Fork Resorts LLC, Adam Thomas Barfield, Gilbert Barfield and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 0019 ( Park System Resource Protection Act)
Rocky Mountain Wild et al v. Vilsack et al
as 1:2009cv01272
Plaintiff:
Colorado Wild and WildEarth Guardians
Defendant:
Tom Vilsack, Abigail Kimbell, Thomas Malecek and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1600 National Forest Managment Act
Attorney General for Oklahoma, et al v. Tyson Foods, Inc., et al
as 08-5154
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA, State of Oklahoma, ex rel. W.A. Drew Edmondson, in his capacity as Attorney General, FDBA W.A. Drew Edmondson and OFFICE OF THE OKLAHOMA SECRETARY OF THE ENVIRONMENT, State of Oklahoma, ex rel. C. Miles Tolbert in his capacity as the Trustee for Natural Resources for the State of Oklahoma
Defendant - Appellee:
CARGILL TURKEY PRODUCTION, LLC, CAL-MAINE FOODS, INC., CARGILL, INC. and others
Defendant-Third-Party-Defendant:
TAHLEQUAH LIVESTOCK AUCTION, INC.
Defendant:
RANDY ALLEN, BIG JOHN'S, CHICKEN CREEK VILLAGE STORE and others
Third-Party-Defendant:
JOHN E. ADAIR, JOHN W. ADAIR, VIRGINIA W. ADAIR and others
Third Party Defendant, Counter Claimant:
CITY OF WATTS
Intervenor:
ARKANSAS NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION and STATE OF ARKANSAS
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF ARKANSAS
Movant:
AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION, NATIONAL CATTLEMEN'S BEEF ASSOCIATION, TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF DAIRYMEN and others
Citizens Committee, et al v. Tidwell, et al
as 07-4011
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CITIZENS COMMITTEE TO SAVE OUR CANYONS, a nonprofit organization and UTAH ENVIRONMENTAL CONGRESS
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, THOMAS TIDWELL, Forest Supervisor for the Wasatch-Cache National Forest, CATHRINE L. BEATY, Intermountain Region Deputy Regional Forester and others
Defendant-Intervenor - Appellee:
WASATCH POWDERBIRD GUIDES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
