Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Viray Enterprises Inc. v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2022cv00019
Plaintiff:
Viray Enterprises, Inc.
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Merrick Garland, Ur Mendoza Jaddon and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Ranchers Cattlemen Action Legal Fund United Stockgrowers of America et al v. United States Department of Agriculture et al
as 1:2019cv00205
Defendant:
Administrator of the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Secretary of Agriculture, Sonny Perdue and others
Plaintiff:
Ranchers Cattlemen Action Legal Fund United Stockgrowers of America, Kenny Fox, Donna Hunt and others
Respondent:
United States Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Administrator, United States Department of Agriculture Secretary and United States Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
State of Kansas, et al v. National Indian Gaming, et al
as 16-3015
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STATE OF KANSAS, ex rel, Derek Schmidt, Attorney General and CHEROKEE COUNTY, KANSAS, BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
Defendant - Appellee:
NATIONAL INDIAN GAMING COMMISSION, JONODEV OSCELOA CHAUDHURI, Acting National Indian Gaming Commissioner, in his official capacity, DANIEL J. LITTLE and others
Universal Oil and Gas LLC et al v. United States Department of the Interior Secretary et al
as 1:2015cv00231
Plaintiff:
Universal Oil and Gas LLC and Donna J Vrooman
Defendant:
United States Department of the Interior Secretary, United States Department of Interior, United States Bureau of Land Management and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 706
Woo v. United States Office of Personnel Management et al
as 6:2015cv01220
Plaintiff:
Mary C. Woo
Defendant:
United States Office of Personnel Management, Katherine Archuleta, Donna Seymour and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
