Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Grynberg v. Tellus Operating Company et al
as 1:2014cv02535
Plaintiff:
Jack J. Grynberg
Defendant:
Tellus Operating Company and Hess Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tomahawk Pipeline Construction, Inc v. Hess Corporation
as 1:2013cv00235
Plaintiff:
Tomahawk Pipeline Construction, Inc
Defendant:
Hess Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Smith et al v. Hess Corporation
as 1:2013cv00468
Plaintiff:
Armand L Smith , Brazos Royalty Trust and Rio Petro, Ltd.
Defendant:
Hess Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Feinman v. American Oil & Gas, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv01846
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey P. Feinman
Defendant:
American Oil & Gas, Inc., Patrick D. O'Brien, Andrew P. Calerich and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Veigel v. American Oil & Gas, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv01852
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Veigel
Defendant:
American Oil & Gas, Inc., Patrick D. O'Brien, Andrew P. Calerich and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cobb v. American Oil & Gas, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv01833
Plaintiff:
Edgar Cobb
Defendant:
American Oil & Gas, Inc., Patrick D. O'Brien, Andrew P. Calerich and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Finkel v. American Oil & Gas, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv01808
Plaintiff:
Morton Finkel
Defendant:
American Oil & Gas, Inc., Patrick D. O'Brien, Andrew P. Calerich and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Korleski v. BP Corporation North America Inc et al
as 2:2007cv02531
Plaintiff:
Joann Korleski
Defendant:
BP Corporation North America Inc, Chevron USA Inc, Circle K Stores, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1407 Multi-District Litigation
Cook et al v. Hess Corporation et al
as 2:2007cv02492
Plaintiff:
S. Garrett Cook, Jr. and Don Hall
Defendant:
Hess Corporation, Chevron USA Inc, Circle K Stores, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
