Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Garcia-Marquez v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2019cv00598
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Melonie R. Garcia-Marquez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Marquez v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2018cv03078
Interested Party:
USAO-SS-Noticing and SSA Noticing
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Ramon Angel Marquez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Marquez v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2018cv02940
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing and USAO-SS-Noticing
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Sarah Lynn Marquez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Marquez-Flores v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2018cv00863
Plaintiff:
Phyllis Marquez-Flores
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Interested_party:
SSA Noticing and USAO-SS-Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Marquez-Hernandez v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2017cv01513
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Hector Marquez-Hernandez
Interested_party:
SSA Noticing and USAO-SS-Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Marquez v. Colvin
as 1:2015cv02001
Plaintiff:
Kenneth James Marquez
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Interested_party:
SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Marquez v. Colvin et al
as 1:2013cv00434
Plaintiff:
Gerald A. Marquez
Defendant:
Carolyn Colvin and SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Marquez v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2010cv01061
Plaintiff:
Mario Marquez
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Ochoa v. Astrue
as 1:2010cv00531
Plaintiff:
Norberto Marquez Ochoa
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Interested_party:
SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
