Cases 11 - 20 of 99
Tri County Telephone Assoc. v. Campbell, et al
as 20-8053
Counter Claimant:
JOE CAMPBELL, an individual, BARBARA CAMPBELL, an individual and JOHN AND JANE DOES
Counter Defendant:
TRI COUNTY TELEPHONE ASSOCIATION, INC., a Wyoming corporation
Smith v. State of Oklahoma, et al
as 20-6115
Defendant / Appellee:
OKLAHOMA COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, FNU RIOS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NICOIS M. SMITH
Campbell v. Bear
as 20-6082
Respondent / Appellee:
CARL BEAR, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
DANNY R. CAMPBELL
United States v. Campbell
as 19-2199
Defendant / Appellant:
MIA COY CAMPBELL
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Peoria Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma v. Campbell et al
as 4:2019cv00581
Plaintiff:
Peoria Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma
Defendant:
Doerner, Saunders, Daniel & Anderson, L.L.P., John Doe, Stuart D Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GDHI Marketing v. Anstel Marketing, et al
as 19-1414
Defendant / Appellee:
THE HOME IMPROVER LLC, THM MANAGEMENT LLC, ELLEN SMITH and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GDHI MARKETING LLC.
Rojas v. Meinster, et al
as 19-1392
Defendant / Appellee:
CYNTHIA SCHIPPERT, ANA GAIL MEINSTER, Hon., ANDREW LOUIZEAUX and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALBERTO ROJAS, JR.
Tri County Telephone v. Campbell, et al
as 19-8043
Not Yet Classified:
JOE CAMPBELL, an individual, BARBARA CAMPBELL, an individual, TRI COUNTY TELEPHONE ASSOCIATION, INC., a Wyoming corporation and others
Lynn v. Brown, et al
as 19-5063
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN DOES, sued as John Does 1-100, THEODORE RIESLING, an individual a/k/a Ted, KIMBERLY BIEDLER SCHUTZ, an individual and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROSEMARY ANN LYNN
Lynn v. Brown et al
as 4:2019cv00332
Defendant:
Purview Life Tulsa, Theodore Riesling, Phillip Feist and others
Plaintiff:
Rosemary Ann Lynn
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
