Cases 11 - 20 of 208
Duran et al v. New Mexico Department of Workforce Solutions et al
as 1:2023cv00417
Plaintiff:
Shaun Duran, Monica Fischetti-Palmieri-Williams, Erdem Yildz and others
Defendant:
New Mexico Department of Workforce Solutions and Sarita Nair
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00979
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Gonzalez Burciaga v. Garland
as 23-9538
Petitioner:
ADRIAN GONZALEZ BURCIAGA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General
Gonzalez-Dominguez v. Garland
as 23-9518
Petitioner:
RENE ROBERTO GONZALEZ-DOMINGUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General
Innovative Sports Management Inc v. Gonzalez et al
as 5:2023cv00076
Defendant:
Javier Santiago Gonzalez individually also known as Javier Santiago Gonzalez Parales doing business as Monica's Bar & Latin Cuisine, Javier Santiago Gonzalez Parales, Saul Elera individually doing business as Monica's Bar & Latin Cuisine and others
Plaintiff:
Innovative Sports Management Inc doing business as Integrated Sports Media
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Gonzalez Lopez v. Garland
as 23-9504
Petitioner:
JOSE RODOLFO GONZALEZ LOPEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03340
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
United States v. Gonzalez-Meza
as 22-6212
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MANUEL ALBERTO GONZALEZ-MEZA
Gonzalez Gomez v. Garland
as 22-9585
Petitioner:
MARIO ALBERTO GONZALEZ GOMEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General
United States v. Murillo-Gonzalez
as 22-2123
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
EPIFANIO MURILLO-GONZALEZ, AKA Epifanio Gonzales
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
