Cases 11 - 20 of 79
Gill v. Viatris Inc. et al *** REMINDER TO COUNSEL -- This case is a tag-a-long action to 17-md-2785, MDL 2785 In Re: Epipen (Epinepherine Injection USP) Marketing, Sales Practices and Antitrust Litigation.***
as 2:2021cv02534
Plaintiff:
Michael Gill
Defendant:
Viatris Inc., MYLAN SPECIALTY L.P., Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Ipson v. Viatris et al
as 2:2021cv00643
Plaintiff:
Landon Ipson
Defendant:
Viatris, Mylan Specialty, Mylan Pharmaceuticals and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Miller v. Yes Management, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv02320
Plaintiff:
Heather Miller
Defendant:
Yes Management, LLC, FSI Santa Barbara Property LLC, Sharon Shyrock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00386
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Price v. Bavaria Inn Restaurant
as 20-1359
Defendant / Appellee:
BAVARIA INN RESTAURANT, INC., DBA Shotgun Willies
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HEATHER PRICE
Valencia v. Board of Regents, et al
as 20-2079
Defendant / Appellee:
DANIELLE KABELLA, SARAH LEISTER, JULIA FULGHUM, in her individual capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER VALENCIA
DCCC et al v. Ziriax et al
as 4:2020cv00211
Defendant:
Debi Thompson, Dr Tim Mauldin, Heather Mahieu Cline and others
Plaintiff:
DCCC and Oklahoma Democratic Party
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Leyva v. Robbins
as 20-4053
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HEATHER LEYVA, an individual
Defendant / Appellee:
BLAINE ROBBINS, a Utah Highway Patrol Trooper
United States v. Carr
as 20-1152
Defendant / Appellant:
HEATHER CARR
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Pfizer, Inc., et al v. All Plaintiffs
as 20-603
Petitioner:
PFIZER, INC., MYLAN N.V., HEATHER BRESCH, CEO of Mylan N.V. and others
Respondent:
ALL PLAINTIFFS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
