Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Channon v. Tavanger, et al
as 19-2192
Defendant / Appellee:
JENNIFER IRELAND, SHELLEY BACA, TP-LINK RESEARCH AMERICA CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTHEW CHANNON
State of New Mexico et al v. McAleenan et al
as 1:2019cv00534
Defendant:
Matthew T Albence, Carla L Provost, Natalie R Asher and others
Plaintiff:
State of New Mexico and The City of Albuquerque
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00290
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Coleman et al v. Statewide Collections Inc et al
as 5:2017cv01191
Plaintiff:
Albert A Coleman , Allen Henderson , Breauna Lee Roberson and others
Defendant:
Statewide Collections Inc , Quick Loans Inc , Breit Company The and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
In re: Buhendwa
as 17-1066
Petitioner:
MADINA BUHENDWA
Respondent:
REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT, BOARD OF DIRECTORS, in their official capacities, BILL JAMES and others
Huber v. Gudjonson
as 1:2016cv00742
Plaintiff:
Natalie Huber
Defendant:
Deneen Gudjonson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Georgelas v. Bliss
as 2:2016cv00559
Plaintiff:
Tammy B. Georgelas
Defendant:
Natalie Bliss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754
Bollinger et al v. Weinman et al
as 1:2016cv00625
In_re:
George Richard Bollinger and Natalie Rolens Bollinger
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey A. Weinman
Defendant:
Rourke Ruffing
Interested_party:
United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Colorado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Maxwell et al v. Larry H. Miller Dealerships
as 1:2015cv00074
Plaintiff:
Natalie Maxwell and Scott Maxwell
Defendant:
Larry H. Miller Dealerships
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
inContact v. Faruqi & Faruqi et al
as 2:2014cv00419
Plaintiff:
inContact
Defendant:
Faruqi & Faruqi and Natalie Gordon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
