Cases 11 - 20 of 96
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00024
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Bralich v. Gayner, et al
as 21-1416
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PHILIP A. BRALICH
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL GAYNER, SHAMBHALA MOUNTAIN CENTER, MEMBERS OF THE SHAMBHALA BOARD and others
Arnold v. City of Olathe, Kansas, et al
as 21-3152
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK ARNOLD, as special administrator and duly-appointed representative and on behalf of heirs of the estate of Ciara Howard,
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF OLATHE, KANSAS, MICHAEL BUTAUD, CHAD MELLICK and others
Johnson v. Peterson
as 21-3119
Petitioner / Appellant:
NOBLE LEROY JOHNSON
Respondent / Appellee:
FNU PETERSON
XMission v. Strategic Task Management et al
as 2:2020cv00725
Plaintiff:
XMission
Defendant:
Alliance Ventures, Chris Armstrong, Offer Space and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 7701
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02383
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Hill v. Myers, et al
as 20-1251
Defendant / Appellee:
MYERS, BRITTANY GOODWIN, C.M. DENWALT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEVEN L. HILL
Peterson v. Nelnet Diversified Solutions
as 20-1217
Defendant / Appellee:
NELNET DIVERSIFIED SOLUTIONS, LLC
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFF PETERSON, on behalf of himself and all similarly situated persons
Peterson v. Williams, et al
as 20-4059
Defendant / Appellee:
RICHARD WILLIAMS, in his individual and official capacities, DIXIE STATE UNIVERSITY, a public collect of the State of Utah; JOHN DOES I-X, in their individual and official capacities; ROE ENTITIES I-X, LYNN JOSEPH, in her individual and official capacities and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEN PETERSON, an individual
Eby v. Peterson, et al
as 20-2064
Defendant / Appellee:
K. JAN PETERSON and DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT CHARLES EBY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
