Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Cummings v. United States Postal Service
as 20-7066
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, AKA USPS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARY F. CUMMINGS
Ssebanakitta v. United States Postal Service
as 6:2020cv01167
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Plaintiff:
Fannie Ssebanakitta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
NLRB v. United States Postal Service
as 19-9614
Petitioner:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Respondent:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Greene v. United States Postal Service
as 19-1305
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CEDRIC GREENE
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Copeland v. Lawrence et al
as 5:2017cv00603
Plaintiff:
Bruce Dwain Copeland
Defendant:
Anne Lawrence , Carla D Haddard, Mary B Stanley Renouf and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4208
NLRB v. United States Postal Service
as 16-9554
Petitioner:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Respondent:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Roecker v. Postmaster General, United States Postal Service
as 2:2015cv07201
Plaintiff:
Allene R. Roecker
Defendant:
Postmaster General, United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 794
Fay v. United States Postal Service et al
as 1:2014cv01093
Plaintiff:
JM (Maria J) Fay
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, Sullivan, Melody and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Bonidy, et al v. USPS, et al
as 13-1374
Amicus Curiae:
BRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE
Defendant / Appellant:
PATRICK DONAHOE, Postmaster General, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and MICHAEL KERVIN, Acting Postmaster, Avon, Colorado
Plaintiff / Appellee:
TAB BONIDY and NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR GUN RIGHTS
TOG, Inc. et al v. United States Postal Service et al
as 1:2012cv01946
Plaintiff:
TOG, Inc. and Wild Harvest, LLC
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, Innovations Group, Inc. and Omar Dajani
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
