Cases 21 - 30 of 230
Kubicek v. CoreSite Realty Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv03292
Plaintiff:
Bryan Kubicek
Defendant:
CoreSite Realty Corporation, Robert G. Stuckey, Paul E. Szurek and others
Bralich v. Gayner, et al
as 21-1416
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PHILIP A. BRALICH
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL GAYNER, SHAMBHALA MOUNTAIN CENTER, MEMBERS OF THE SHAMBHALA BOARD and others
Bey v. Kelly, et al
as 21-3223
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHELLE AVERY BEY
Defendant / Appellee:
LAURA KELLY, DAVID ALVEY and DONALD TRACY
Ridley v. State of Kansas, et al
as 21-3201
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANTHONY EARL RIDLEY
Respondent / Appellee:
STATE OF KANSAS, LAURA KELLY, Governor of Kansas, JEFF ZMUDA, Secretary of Corrections and others
LS3 Inc. v. Cherokee Nation Strategic Programs, et al
as 21-1385
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LS3 INC., a Maryland corporation
Defendant / Appellee:
CHEROKEE NATION STRATEGIC PROGRAMS, L.L.C., an Oklahoma limited liability company, CHEROKEE FEDERAL SOLUTIONS, L.L.C., an Oklahoma limited liability company, CHEROKEE SERVICES GROUP, LLC, a Cherokee Nation limited liability company and others
Bey v. Kelly et al
as 2:2021cv02367
Plaintiff:
Michelle Avery Bey
Defendant:
Laura Kelly, David Alvey and Donald Tracy
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00112
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Cambria Capital v. Fusaro
as 2:2021cv00428
Plaintiff:
Cambria Capital
Defendant:
Kelli Fusaro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv01171
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Clark v. Oklahoma Pardon & Parole Board, et al
as 21-6079
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HERMAN TRACY CLARK
Defendant / Appellee:
OKLAHOMA PARDON AND PAROLE BOARD, TOM BATES, Executive Director, C. ALLEN MCCALL, J.D. Member and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
